Notice: Welcome to ScatChan. An account has automatically been created and assigned to you. You don't have to register or log in to use the board, but don't clear your cookies unless you have set a memorable name and password. By entering ScatChan, you agree to respect its rules and acknowledge that you have read and agreed to respect ScatChan's legal disclaimer.

Topic: The paper Matt and Reid coauthored at MIT is actually brilliant.

+ Point !h.Ps90uO.s — 9 months ago #15,587

The paper

inb4 "it's derivative dribble". The process they used performed the highest hit ratio (with > 50% accuracy) for probabilistic methods that I've ever seen!

+ Leonidas !nBpim1wazU — 9 months ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #125,850

hmm

+ Anonymous C — 9 months ago, 5 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #125,856

Is this some kind of communist/terrorist manifesto? Perhaps that's why Matt made a deal with Reid.

· Point !h.Ps90uO.s (OP) — 9 months ago, 4 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #125,860

@previous (C)
It's a CS paper they coauthored at MIT, to show how forward-error correction can be improved.

+ Anonymous D — 9 months ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #125,911

lol, it's one of those auto-generated papers. Those are quite brilliant actually!

· Leonidas !nBpim1wazU — 9 months ago, 48 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #125,920

@previous (D)

All technical papers look like gibberish. Poor communication skills.

· Anonymous D — 9 months ago, 23 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #125,928

@previous (Leonidas)
"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke
: